Public analytics

Statistics

Understand the reviewed stablecoin registry at a glance: what state assets are in, what kinds of models are recorded, where historical failures cluster, what changed recently, and how much evidence supports the view.

Reviewed checkpoint
Canonical assets
144
Scope
Historical registry

Executive summary

What the registry says now

Inventory and historical context only. No market-share, price, safety, or investment scoring.

Stable assets
144

Canonical records

Organizations
124

Reviewed organizations

Material events
224

Historical events

Evidence
647

Reviewed evidence items

Current read
  • Operating is the largest lifecycle group at 110 of 144 assets (76.39%).
  • Algorithmic Supply has 4 failed assets among 5 recorded in that mechanism category (80%).
  • The latest 12 recorded months contain 71 material events.

Current state

Lifecycle distribution

Operating, constrained, historical non-failure, and failed records stay separate so an orderly migration or termination is not presented as a collapse.

Operating11076.39%
Constrained1711.81%
Historical Non Failure85.56%
Failed64.17%
Other32.08%

Composition

What kinds of stable assets are recorded

Four high-value dimensions replace the previous wall of equally weighted classification panels. Unknown values remain explicit.

Reference target

Asset share
Fiat139
96.53%
Commodity2
1.39%
Index2
1.39%
Floating1
0.69%

Backing type

Multi-select
Cash42
29.17%
Mixed38
26.39%
Stablecoin Collateral32
22.22%
Crypto Collateral31
21.53%
Bank Deposits26
18.06%
Government Securities26
18.06%

Backing categories can overlap; percentages do not sum to 100%.

Redemption status

Asset share
Eligible Customers Only44
30.56%
Protocol Based36
25%
Restricted18
12.5%
Unknown15
10.42%
Terminated11
7.64%
Institutional Only9
6.25%

Deployment chains

Assets / deployments
Ethereum93
93 assets · 95 deployments
Solana20
20 assets · 21 deployments
Base11
11 assets · 11 deployments
Polygon10
10 assets · 10 deployments
BNB Chain8
8 assets · 8 deployments
TRON3
3 assets · 4 deployments

Historical failure patterns

Where recorded failures are concentrated

These are descriptive historical shares: failed assets in a category divided by all recorded assets in that same category. They are not forecasts or safety scores.

By stabilization mechanism

Failed / category total
Algorithmic Supply80%
4 / 5 assets
Overcollateralized Vault6.3%
1 / 16 assets
Hybrid4.3%
1 / 23 assets

By backing type

Failed / category total
Unbacked80%
4 / 5 assets
Other7.1%
1 / 14 assets
Stablecoin Collateral6.3%
2 / 32 assets
Crypto Collateral3.2%
1 / 31 assets
Mixed2.6%
1 / 38 assets

Backing types overlap; each rate uses that backing category's own denominator.

Recorded depeg outcomes

What happened after depeg events

Collapsed
3
42.86%
Not Recovered
3
42.86%
Recovered
1
14.29%

Change over time

Material events in the latest recorded months

Canonical event dates are grouped into month buckets at build time. Undated events are not assigned to a month.

LaunchStatus ReviewRedemption ChangeSecurity IncidentOther event types
2
2
7
4
5
3
4
11
24
1
3
5

Coverage and confidence

How complete and current is this view?

Coverage describes the registry's evidence and review state. It does not rate the safety or transparency of a stablecoin.

Evidence coverage100%

144 of 144 assets have at least one evidence item

Fresh review ≤ 90d37.5%

54 of 144 assets

Reserve-report coverage77.1%

111 of 144 assets

Deployment coverage95.8%

138 of 144 assets

Known unknowns381

75 assets have high/critical unknowns

Explore next

Move from aggregate patterns to records

Every card opens an existing public registry surface or supported filter.