Registry analysis

Statistics

A readable analytical summary of the reviewed registry. This page prioritizes the patterns that explain the corpus; exhaustive machine-readable records remain available separately.

Reviewed checkpoint
Canonical denominator
116 assets
Distinct growth checkpoints
13

Current checkpoint

Registry at a glance

Exact audited counts. These are inventory measures, not rankings, market-share estimates, or safety scores.

Stable assets
116

Canonical asset records

Organizations
107

Canonical organization records

Events
191

Material historical events

Evidence
571

Reviewed evidence records

Lifecycle

Where the registry stands now

Operating, constrained, historical non-failure, and failed records remain separate so closure is not confused with collapse.

Operating85

73.28% of canonical assets

Constrained14

12.07% of canonical assets

Historical Non Failure8

6.9% of canonical assets

Failed6

5.17% of canonical assets

Other3

2.59% of canonical assets

Active85 records73.28%
Restricted11 records9.48%
Collapsed6 records5.17%
Terminated3 records2.59%
Unknown3 records2.59%
Winding Down3 records2.59%
Inactive2 records1.72%
Migrated2 records1.72%
Rebranded1 records0.86%

Composition

What kinds of assets are recorded

Each panel is a separate classification dimension. Long tails are combined into “Other recorded values” instead of being dumped into an unreadable wall.

Asset class

Stablecoin103
88.79%
Stable Value Asset6
5.17%
Yield Bearing Stable Receipt4
3.45%
Tokenized Commodity2
1.72%
Experimental Stabilization Asset1
0.86%

Reference target

Fiat111
95.69%
Commodity2
1.72%
Index2
1.72%
Floating1
0.86%

Stabilization mechanism

Issuer Redemption57
49.14%
Hybrid23
19.83%
Overcollateralized Vault16
13.79%
Protocol Arbitrage9
7.76%
Algorithmic Supply5
4.31%
Other recorded values6
5.2%

Governance model

Centralized57
49.14%
DAO Governed27
23.28%
Protocol Governed26
22.41%
Hybrid6
5.17%

Backing type

Mixed38
32.76%
Cash33
28.45%
Stablecoin Collateral32
27.59%
Crypto Collateral31
26.72%
Bank Deposits25
21.55%
Other recorded values57
49.1%

Fiat reference currency

USD81
72.97%
EUR11
9.91%
JPY3
2.7%
CHF2
1.8%
GBP2
1.8%
Other recorded values12
10.8%

Legal classification

Protocol Asset40
34.48%
Unclassified32
27.59%
Fiat Backed Stablecoin31
26.72%
E Money Token12
10.34%
Fund Share1
0.86%
Other recorded values1
0.9%

Historical activity

Events and failure patterns

The page shows the recent historical shape and leading categories rather than hundreds of individual event rows.

Events by year

20187
20195
202010
202120
202226
202319
202427
202526
202635
unknown16

Leading event types

Launch77
40.31%
Status Review12
6.28%
Protocol Upgrade7
3.66%
Protocol Model Update6
3.14%
Launched5
2.62%
Depeg4
2.09%
Migration4
2.09%
Other recorded values76
39.7%
Canonical failed assets6
Leading stabilization mechanismAlgorithmic Supply4 records · 66.67%
Leading backing typeUnbacked4 records · 66.67%
Leading governance modelProtocol Governed6 records · 100%
Most common collapse yearUnknown5 records · 83.33%

Network and institutions

Where assets are deployed and who supports them

Chain rows count deployments; organization rows count recorded relationships. Neither is a market-share measure.

Total deployments
182
Assets with deployments
116
Freeze capability known
1
Blacklist capability known
1

Top deployment chains

Ethereum86 assets
88
Solana15 assets
16
Base9 assets
9
Polygon9 assets
9
BNB Chain7 assets
7
Arbitrum One3 assets
3
TRON2 assets
3
XRP Ledger3 assets
3
Celo2 assets
2
Concordium2 assets
2

Leading organization roles

Protocol operator62 relationships54 organizations · 62 assets
Legal issuer54 relationships42 organizations · 53 assets
Brand owner5 relationships5 organizations · 5 assets
Technology provider3 relationships3 organizations · 3 assets
Reserve manager2 relationships2 organizations · 2 assets
Custodian1 relationships1 organizations · 1 assets
Other1 relationships1 organizations · 1 assets

Data quality

Coverage, evidence depth, and freshness

These figures measure registry completeness and review recency. They do not rate the safety or transparency of an asset.

Coverage

Classification116 / 116
100%
Deployment116 / 116
100%
Legal Profile116 / 116
100%
Reserve Component116 / 116
100%
Reserve Redemption Profile116 / 116
100%
Archive Evidence442 / 571
77.41%
Stable Asset Relationship8 / 116
6.9%

Evidence profile

Average evidence per asset
4.86
Median evidence per asset
4.5
Known unknowns
337
Typed event coverage
191 / 191

Evidence depth

5 Plus
58
2 4
55
1
3

Verification recency

31 90 Days
74
0 30 Days
42

Growth

How the reviewed corpus changed

Repeated checkpoints with identical totals are removed here. The remaining rows show material inventory changes, not market performance.

Assets added
+16
Events added
+19
Evidence added
+69
Assets110
Events185
Evidence543
Assets110
Events185
Evidence547
Assets110
Events185
Evidence549
Assets110
Events185
Evidence551
Assets112
Events187
Evidence557
Assets112
Events187
Evidence559
Assets114
Events189
Evidence565
Assets116
Events191
Evidence571